Steve Harvey Is The Grinch Who Stole Christmas

Get a little Grinch-y with this blog post.



Since Steve Harvey is recently in the news, let’s talk about him. He was last seen messing up the winner of the 2015 Miss Universe pageant (and if that kind of thing ever happens to Leonardo DiCaprio, I will burn Kodak theater to the ground), but Harvey has had some gnarly things to say about the non-religious in the past.

Joy Behar: “Do you believe that only people who are religious are ethical and moral?”

Harvey: “No, I just believe that if you don’t believe in God, where’s your moral barometer?”

We’re going to skip over the part where this is really dumb and offensive, because we all know that it is. Let’s instead go to the part where Harvey’s comments highlight one of Christianity’s most sacred tenets:

Goodness comes from God. 

For this illustration, I’d like to introduce you to Mr. Grinch.

The Grinch is one of my favorite antiheroes. Throughout the whole book/movie, it is set up that he does not like Christmas. He doesn’t like the music, or the gifts, and especially not the rare Who Roast Beast. He decides that because he hates Christmas soooooo much, he’s going to fix it the only way he knows how: grand larceny.

The Grinch sees all the presents that the Who have built up over the Christmas season, and concocts a dastardly plan to steal them all, and with them, Christmas itself. He does just this, and on Christmas morning, as he listens out over Mount Crumpit to hear the muffled tears of the children and parents devastated by the lack of Christmas, he instead hears singing. This leads him to my favorite line in the whole shebang:

It came without ribbons. It came without tags. It came without packages, boxes or bags. And he puzzled and puzzled ’till his puzzler was sore. Then the Grinch thought of something he hadn’t before. What if Christmas, he thought, doesn’t come from a store. What if Christmas, perhaps, means a little bit more.

The whole emotional pull of the Grinch is in this moment, where he realizes that there is nothing he could do to stop Christmas, because it wasn’t dependent on material things in the least.

So, Steve Harvey thinks that you have to believe in God to have some kind of moral barometer, but it sounds to me like he needs to learn the same lesson as the Grinch.

What if Christmas, he thought, doesn’t come from a store?

Here’s my idea: How beautiful could life be if you realized that God, Jesus, and the Bible don’t make you good? What if Christians understood that they don’t have to be afraid that they can’t be good without God, because their goodness is not dependent on any book, idea, or philosopher, but on whether or not they decide to be good?

That kind of freedom sounds like a very merry Christmas present.

For more on Harvey’s comments on atheists, check out this link.

Feel free to comment, like, share, and follow below! If you appreciated this blog, become my Patron!





3 thoughts on “Steve Harvey Is The Grinch Who Stole Christmas”

  1. I am an atheist. I believe in relative morality. Most of my morals I have adopted from the culture which I grew up in (as I believe is the case for everybody) and I have appended some moral guidelines for myself and removed some which I found to be outdated. When Christians talk about atheists not having a “moral barometer” or whatever metaphor they use, they are referring to this concept of relative morality which many atheists hold. With relative morality, there is no authoritative standard by which you can compare and judge people’s moral actions. An atheist can judge people by their personal moral standard, but what makes one person’s moral code more “correct” than another’s? Or an atheist can judge people by their cultural moral standard or by the laws of their country, but what makes one culture’s morality or one country’s laws more righteous than another’s? Christians and many people of other religions believe that if there was a Creator God who made moral laws, this would be a standard which everyone could be fairly judged against.

    Christians see themselves as basing their moral actions on a firm foundation, while atheists are basing their morals on every-fluctuating sand. I have to agree. I think that a stable and unchanging moral code is one of the many fantasies which religion has concocted and which the sober-minded must accept is unrealistic. I cannot say that morality progresses, since the entire idea of progress is rooted in having an ultimate standard to compare it to, but I can say that the morals of today will likely be different from the morals a thousand years from now. However, we as individuals and as societies do have moral codes and moral standards, even if moral relativists don’t believe in an ultimate moral standard by which to judge all of the relative moral standards.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s